[lustre-discuss] lfsck repair quota

[Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)]

> On Apr 17, 2019, at 4:32 AM, Fernando Perez <fperez at icm.csic.es> wrote:
> 
> I tried to run the e2fsck in the mdt three years ago and the logs shows a lot of this kind of messages:
> 
>> Unattached inode 26977505
>> Connect to /lost+found? yes
>> Inode 26977505 ref count is 2, should be 1. Fix? yes
> 
> In fact I think that the e2fsc ran so slow due that all the mdt inodes were corrected.

You may already be doing this, but just in case, make sure that you are using the latest version of Whamcloud’s e2fsprogs (https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/e2fsprogs/latest/).

--
Rick Mohr
Senior HPC System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
http://www.nics.tennessee.edu