[lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build
Tauferner, Andrew T
andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com
Thu Jan 10 17:13:12 PST 2019
> Does the configure output show lustre.spec being created? You can also check in config.log:
Yes.
config.status:1592: creating lustre.spec
config.status:1592: creating lustre-dkms.spec
> If it was created, as requested in my previous email, did you check if
> the lustre.spec file was included into the lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz file
> (that file is created by rpmbuild during the "make rpms" process)?
It was not. The tar file is only 20 bytes. Shouldn't I expect to see directory lustre-release/lustre-2.12.0?
attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> ll
total 3356
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 588298 Jan 10 08:33 aclocal.m4
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 282 Jan 10 08:29 autogen.sh
drwxr-xr-x 2 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:52 autom4te.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 49285 Jan 10 13:58 autoMakefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 11698 Jan 10 08:33 autoMakefile.am
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 47802 Jan 10 13:52 autoMakefile.in
drwxr-xr-x 3 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 build
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 48 Jan 10 08:29 ChangeLog
drwxr-xr-x 2 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 config
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 25704 Jan 10 09:06 config.h
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 24118 Jan 10 08:33 config.h.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 720216 Jan 10 13:58 config.log
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 87442 Jan 10 13:58 config.status
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 1266492 Jan 10 08:33 configure
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 489 Jan 10 08:29 configure.ac
drwxr-xr-x 6 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 08:29 contrib
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 18483 Jan 10 08:29 COPYING
drwxr-xr-x 3 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 08:33 debian
drwxr-xr-x 2 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 08:29 Documentation
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 113 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre.files
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 146 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre-osd-ldiskfs.files
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 298 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre-osd-ldiskfs.preamble
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 78 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre-osd-zfs.files
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 162 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre-osd-zfs.preamble
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 45 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre.preamble
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 56 Jan 10 16:57 kmp-lustre-tests.files
drwxr-xr-x 3 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 ldiskfs
drwxr-xr-x 5 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 libcfs
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 339169 Jan 10 13:58 libtool
drwxr-xr-x 9 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 lnet
drwxr-xr-x 35 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 lustre
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 20 Jan 10 16:57 lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 1076 Jan 10 08:29 lustre-dkms_post-build.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 2420 Jan 10 08:29 lustre-dkms_pre-build.sh
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 4661 Jan 10 13:58 lustre-dkms.spec
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 4751 Jan 10 08:29 lustre-dkms.spec.in
drwxr-xr-x 8 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 lustre-iokit
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 17764 Jan 10 13:58 lustre.spec
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 17776 Jan 10 08:29 lustre.spec.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 24 Jan 10 08:33 LUSTRE-VERSION-FILE
-rwxr-xr-x 1 attaufer intelall 749 Jan 10 08:33 LUSTRE-VERSION-GEN
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 13167 Jan 10 08:29 MAINTAINERS
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 99 Jan 10 13:58 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 86 Jan 10 08:29 Makefile.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 924 Jan 10 08:29 README
drwxr-xr-x 2 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 08:29 rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 1254 Jan 10 13:58 Rules
drwxr-xr-x 4 attaufer intelall 4096 Jan 10 13:58 snmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 23 Jan 10 13:58 stamp-h1
-rw-r--r-- 1 attaufer intelall 24054 Jan 10 13:13 undef.h
> You never really mentioned it, but what distro are you using? I've
> recently built on both RHEL6 and RHEL7 using this process without
> problems (the build mechanism for the full release packages is somewhat
> different and more complex), so it seems likely that there is something
> strange with your environment.
I'm running on SLES12 SP3 but I'm trying to build lustre for an experimental kernel that will run on a different node in the cluster.
I wouldn't suspect any strange RPM macros as I'm able to build other RPMs (the kernel RPM, for example) on this system.
I don't have a different system on which to build this.
Thanks.
Andrew Tauferner
1-952-562-4944 (office)
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger at whamcloud.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 5:16 PM
To: Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com>
Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build
On Jan 10, 2019, at 15:29, Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. Here's the proof:
>
> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> sh autogen.sh && ./configure --with-linux=/nfshome/attaufer/kernel/usr/src/kernels/4.14.54-mos-tc3-20181113
> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
>
> <snip>
>
> config.status: config.h is unchanged
> config.status: executing depfiles commands
> config.status: executing libtool commands
Does the configure output show lustre.spec being created? You can also
check in config.log:
$ grep "\.spec" config.log
config.status:1548: creating lustre.spec
config.status:1548: creating lustre-dkms.spec
If it was created, as requested in my previous email, did you check if
the lustre.spec file was included into the lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz file
(that file is created by rpmbuild during the "make rpms" process)?
$ tar tzvf lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz | grep "\.spec"
> Type 'make' to build Lustre.
> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> make rpms
> make dist-gzip am__post_remove_distdir='@:'
> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
> if test -d "lustre-2.12.0"; then find "lustre-2.12.0" -type d ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0" || { sleep 5 && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0"; }; else :; fi
> test -d "lustre-2.12.0" || mkdir "lustre-2.12.0"
> (cd ldiskfs && make top_distdir=../lustre-2.12.0 distdir=../lustre-2.12.0/ldiskfs \
> am__remove_distdir=: am__skip_length_check=: am__skip_mode_fix=: distdir)
> make[2]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release/ldiskfs'
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release/ldiskfs'
> (cd lustre-iokit && make top_distdir=../lustre-2.12.0 distdir=../lustre-2.12.0/lustre-iokit \
I don't think we need this whole spew each time... Usually the errors
are in the last 20 or so lines.
You never really mentioned it, but what distro are you using? I've recently built on both RHEL6 and RHEL7 using this process without problems (the build mechanism for the full release packages is somewhat different and more complex), so it seems likely that there is something strange with your environment.
Based on the 4.14 kernel, I'd assume RHEL7.5 alt? Any strange RPM macros that might be affecting the build? Have you tried on a different system?
Cheers, Andreas
> tardir=lustre-2.12.0 && false | GZIP=--best gzip -c >lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
> if test -d "lustre-2.12.0"; then find "lustre-2.12.0" -type d ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0" || { sleep 5 && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0"; }; else :; fi
> rpmbuilddir=`mktemp -t -d rpmbuild-lustre-$USER-XXXXXXXX`; \
> make \
> rpmbuilddir="$rpmbuilddir" rpm-local || exit 1; \
> cp ./rpm/* .; \
> /usr/bin/rpmbuild \
> --define "_tmppath $rpmbuilddir/TMP" \
> --define "_topdir $rpmbuilddir" \
> --define "dist %{nil}" \
> -ts lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz || exit 1; \
> cp $rpmbuilddir/SRPMS/lustre-2.12.0-*.src.rpm . || exit 1; \
> rm -rf $rpmbuilddir
> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
> error: Failed to read spec file from lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz
> autoMakefile:1189: recipe for target 'srpm' failed
> make: *** [srpm] Error 1
>
> Andrew Tauferner
> 1-952-562-4944 (office)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger at whamcloud.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:39 PM
> To: Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com>
> Cc: Degremont, Aurelien <degremoa at amazon.com>; lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build
>
> Did you run "sh autogen.sh && ./configure" before your "make rpms"? The lustre.spec file should be generated by configure. You can check this before running the "make rpms", and check the tarball to see if it is included.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>> On Jan 10, 2019, at 14:19, Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. Same error with v2_12_0. It would seem that the 4.14 kernel isn't the issue.
>>
>> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> git status
>> On branch 2.12.0
>> nothing to commit, working tree clean
>> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> make rpms
>> make dist-gzip am__post_remove_distdir='@:'
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> :
>> tardir=lustre-2.12.0 && false | GZIP=--best gzip -c >lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz
>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> if test -d "lustre-2.12.0"; then find "lustre-2.12.0" -type d ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0" || { sleep 5 && rm -rf "lustre-2.12.0"; }; else :; fi
>> rpmbuilddir=`mktemp -t -d rpmbuild-lustre-$USER-XXXXXXXX`; \
>> make \
>> rpmbuilddir="$rpmbuilddir" rpm-local || exit 1; \
>> cp ./rpm/* .; \
>> /usr/bin/rpmbuild \
>> --define "_tmppath $rpmbuilddir/TMP" \
>> --define "_topdir $rpmbuilddir" \
>> --define "dist %{nil}" \
>> -ts lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz || exit 1; \
>> cp $rpmbuilddir/SRPMS/lustre-2.12.0-*.src.rpm . || exit 1; \
>> rm -rf $rpmbuilddir
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> error: Failed to read spec file from lustre-2.12.0.tar.gz
>> autoMakefile:1189: recipe for target 'srpm' failed
>> make: *** [srpm] Error 1
>>
>> Andrew Tauferner
>> 1-952-562-4944 (office)
>> 1-507-696-4609 (mobile)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Degremont, Aurelien [mailto:degremoa at amazon.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 11:49 AM
>> To: Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com>; Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com>
>> Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build
>>
>> 2.10.6 does not support Linux 4.14.
>> There is several patches that needs to be cherry picked to have it working.
>>
>> 2.12 is fine though.
>>
>>
>> Aurélien
>>
>> Le 09/01/2019 18:43, « lustre-discuss au nom de Tauferner, Andrew T » <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org au nom de andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com> a écrit :
>>
>> I configured like so:
>>
>> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> ./configure --disable-server --with-linux=/nfshome/attaufer/kernel/usr/src/kernels/4.14.54-mos-tc3-20181113
>>
>> The make failed as follows:
>>
>> attaufer at head-2:~/lustre-release> make rpms
>> make dist-gzip am__post_remove_distdir='@:'
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> grep -v config.h.in config.h.in > undef.h
>> if test -d "lustre-2.10.6"; then find "lustre-2.10.6" -type d ! -perm -200 -exec chmod u+w {} ';' && rm -rf "lustre-2.10.6" || { sleep 5 && rm -rf "lustre-2.10.6"; }; else :; fi
>> test -d "lustre-2.10.6" || mkdir "lustre-2.10.6"
>> :
>> /usr/bin/rpmbuild \
>> --define "_tmppath $rpmbuilddir/TMP" \
>> --define "_topdir $rpmbuilddir" \
>> --define "dist %{nil}" \
>> -ts lustre-2.10.6.tar.gz || exit 1; \
>> cp $rpmbuilddir/SRPMS/lustre-2.10.6-*.src.rpm . || exit 1; \
>> rm -rf $rpmbuilddir
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/nfshome/attaufer/lustre-release'
>> error: Failed to read spec file from lustre-2.10.6.tar.gz
>> autoMakefile:1179: recipe for target 'srpm' failed
>> make: *** [srpm] Error 1
>>
>> Andrew Tauferner
>> 1-952-562-4944 (office)
>> 1-507-696-4609 (mobile)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Dilger [mailto:adilger at whamcloud.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 1:20 AM
>> To: Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com>
>> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones at whamcloud.com>; lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build
>>
>> You can typically do the simple steps:
>>
>> - checkout Lustre release (4.14 probably needs the 2.12.0 release, but maybe
>> 2.10.6 will also work)
>> - sh autogen.sh
>> - ./configure
>> - make rpms
>>
>> You have to have the kernel-headers package installed for the target kernel,
>> along with the proper .config file.
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 16:03, Tauferner, Andrew T <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I looked over that documentation before but it wasn’t clear how to build only the Lustre kernel modules (lnet.ko, lustre.ko, libcfs.ko, etc.). I was relying on the 4.14 kernel build but the lustre code in the staging directory there is quite old and disappears completely in 4.18. So now I need to do an out of tree build for Lustre. Also, the target kernel is not running on the build system.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>> From: Peter Jones [mailto:pjones at whamcloud.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 4:44 PM
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.lustre.org/Compiling_Lustre should hopefully have the info you need
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: "Tauferner, Andrew T" <andrew.t.tauferner at intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m trying to build Lustre (v2_10_6) kernel modules for a custom x86_64 kernel. Can somebody point me to the proper place for source and build instructions? Thanks.
>>>>>
Cheers, Andreas
---
Andreas Dilger
CTO Whamcloud
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list