[lustre-discuss] Lustre High Availability experience

[Grenville Whelan]

Hello Lustre Community,

I am interested to hear about High Availability experiences from the 
Lustre community with regards to Lustre/ZFS with Pacemaker/Corosync and 
would be grateful to hear from any users that would be willing to share 
their experience (good and bad).

We have been developing our own enterprise-grade HA technology for over 
25 years and exclusively on ZFS for over 10 years, and are looking for 
opportunities to develop our technology specifically for Lustre.

I would be especially interested to hear of views and experiences with 
Corosync/Pacemaker limitations and any reliability issues and areas of 
improvement that users would like to see.

Many thanks in advance.

-- 

Grenville Whelan
High-Availability.com

Email: gren at high-availability.com <mailto:gren at high-availability.com>

Web: www.high-availability.com <http://www.high-availability.com>

Mobile: +44 (0)7795-552829

Office: +44 (0)1625-527360

High-Availability

Trusted by more than 4,000 Enterprise ZFS Clusters Worldwide

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20200124/72b34786/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: HAC_logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20200124/72b34786/attachment-0001.png>