[lustre-discuss] unable to precreate -52/-116
ahkumar at mail.smu.edu
Mon Mar 9 10:23:12 PDT 2020
Thank you for the response on this issue.
We have an HA setup, I tried to fail over MDT to the secondary pair and then fail it back. This did not help.
I also tried restart of the MDS servers, that did not help.
I have rebooted OSS servers as well, that did not help
I also tried completely stopping MDS and unmounting MDS for a little while and that did not help either.
This error ritually comes back right after MDT is mounted. Additionally I am not able to manually create any files on that particular OST. Any other thoughts.
From: Marco Grossi <marco.grossi at ichec.ie>
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 11:23 AM
To: Kumar, Amit <ahkumar at mail.smu.edu>
Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] unable to precreate -52/-116
We had a similar issue after a set_param of "max_create_count=0"
In our case re-mounting the MDT (not the OST) fixed the issue.
Hope it helps.
On 3/3/20 8:25 PM, Kumar, Amit wrote:
> Dear Lustre,
> Recently we had a degraded(Not failed) RAID and had to wait longer to
> get compatible disk, as we had received incompatible one and it took
> over a week to get the correct one back in place.
> During this wait I ended up disabling the OST first and then noticed
> continuous IO to the OST and thought of disabling object creation on
> it as well. Everything looked normal after that and once the disk was
> replaced I reenabled object creation and enabled OST. Since then I
> started seeing these messages on OST
> .(ofd_dev.c:1784:ofd_create_hdl()) scratch0-OST0029: unable to
> precreate: rc = -52
> And following messages on MDS
> scratch0-OST0029-osc-MDT0000: cannot precreate objects: rc = -116
> scratch0-OST0029-osc-MDT0000: precreate fid
> [0x100290000:0x101b39a:0x0] < local used fid
> [0x100290000:0x101b39a:0x0]: rc = -116
> These messages don't seem to stop. I am wondering what impact could
> these errors have in long run? I have noticed I am not able to create
> files on this particular OST using lfs setstripe, when I do so it gets
> me an object on another OST by default. Just want to make sure this is
> not causing any data loss for files the currently on them and new requests?
> We plan to upgrade to 2.12 in the summer downtime and assuming that
> has a fix based on LU-9442 & LU-11186. Currently running servers on
> 10.4.1 over ZFS-0.7.9-1
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
> Thank you,
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
ICHEC Systems Team
----IF CLASSIFICATION START----
----IF CLASSIFICATION END----
More information about the lustre-discuss