[lustre-discuss] Max Single OSS throughput is not crossing 7 GB/s Reads

Karan Singh karanveersingh5623 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 18:46:36 PDT 2022


I changed the below param , just to check if any differences seen ,
unfortunately nothing ...all same

# lctl set_param ost.OSS.ost.threads_max=1024
# lctl set_param ost.OSS.ost.threads_min=512

[image: image.png]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 2:24 PM Karan Singh <karanveersingh5623 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> hahahha...its just a typo...just testing both in order to understand the
> IOs performance .
>
> mpirun -hostfile nodefile --map-by node -np 16 /usr/local/bin/ior -a POSIX
> --posix.odirect -v -i 50 -g -F -e -k -o /mnt/lustre/test.ior -r -t
> ${xfersize} -b ${blksize} -O summaryFile=./${TESTDIR}/
> iorresult_SeqWrite_p${numthreads}_bs${blksize}_tf${
> xfersize}.json,summaryFormat=JSON
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 1:22 PM Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 28, 2022, at 21:51, Karan Singh via lustre-discuss <
>> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi team
>>
>> Below are the details :
>> Using 40 lustre docker clients running on 4 x Dell R750 with each lustre
>> docker client running the below mentioned command
>>
>> ${xfersize} = ${blksize}
>> ${blksize} = 128M, 64M, 32M, 16M, 8M, 4M, 2M, 1M
>>
>> mpirun -hostfile nodefile --map-by node -np 16 /usr/local/bin/ior -a
>> POSIX --posix.odirect -v -i 50 -g -F -e -k -o /mnt/beegfs/test.ior
>>
>>
>> I think the problem is pretty clear right here - you are using BeeGFS for
>> your testing, not Lustre...  :-)
>>
>> -r -t ${xfersize} -b ${blksize} -O summaryFile=./${TESTDIR}/
>> iorresult_SeqWrite_p${numthreads}_bs${blksize}_tf${
>> xfersize}.json,summaryFormat=JSON
>>
>>
>> <image.png>
>>
>> please let me know what is the bottleneck in the above setup ?
>> Also if you need more info , will be provide it right away .
>>
>>
>> Cheers, Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Dilger
>> Lustre Principal Architect
>> Whamcloud
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20220630/633846e6/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 230700 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20220630/633846e6/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list