[lustre-discuss] Anyone know why lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.8_6_g5457c37-1.el7.noarch.rpm won't install?

Mannthey, Keith keith.mannthey at intel.com
Tue May 3 17:16:27 PDT 2022

  I has been a while since I installed Lustre ZFS and I am working to get 2.12.8 Lustre ZFS going on a basic system.

The lib* spl* and zfs* packages all install with DKMS with no issue.

lustre-zfs-dkms-2.12.8_6_g5457c37-1.el7.noarch.rpm does not want to install:
   The root issues seems to be a zfs-devel package is missing from https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-2.12-release/el7/server/RPMS/x86_64/  ?
   Any ideas?

The Lustre ZFS DKMS build errors out with:
checking if kernel has 64-bit quota limits support... yes
checking if Linux kernel was built with CONFIG_QUOTA in or as module... yes
checking whether to build ldiskfs... no
checking whether to enable zfs... yes
checking zfs source directory... /usr/src/zfs-3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64
checking zfs build directory... /var/lib/dkms/zfs/3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64/3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64/x86_64
checking user provided zfs devel headers...
checking zfs devel headers... -I/usr/include/libspl -I /usr/include/libzfs
./configure: line 33341: test: zfs: integer expression expected
configure: error:

Required zfs osd cannot be built due to missing zfs development headers.

Support for zfs can be enabled by downloading the required packages for your
distribution. See http://zfsonlinux.org/ to determine is zfs is supported by
your distribution.

configure error, check /var/lib/dkms/lustre-zfs/2.12.8_6_g5457c37/build/config.log

Building module:
cleaning build area...(bad exit status: 2)
make -j72 KERNELRELEASE=3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64...(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/lustre-zfs/2.12.8_6_g5457c37/build/make.log for more information.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20220504/66117acb/attachment.html>

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list