[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.16 zfs version

[Peter Jones]

Alastair

No, 2.16 is not an LTS release and there are no plans to issue ongoing releases for it I corrected the * on the table - thanks for pointing that out.

Peter

On 1/10/25, 9:03 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Alastair Basden" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk <mailto:a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk>> wrote:


[You don't often get email from a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk <mailto:a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk>. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> ]


Hi Andreas,


Thanks.


Is there likely to be a RH 9.5 release for 2.16 imminently?


I also notice on the support matrix that 2.12 is still designated as the
LTS in the second table (with the * against it, rather than 2.15).


Cheers,
Alastair.


On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, Andreas Dilger wrote:


> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> It looks like lustre/ChangeLog lists 2.2.15 and the builds are currently using 2.1.15, and there is a patch to fix a build problem for 2.2.3:
> https://review.whamcloud.com/57452 <https://review.whamcloud.com/57452>
>
> I've updated the support matrix to reflect this.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On Jan 9, 2025, at 05:36, Alastair Basden <a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk <mailto:a.g.basden at durham.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On the Lustre Support Matrix page (wiki):
> https://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Lustre+Support+Matrix <https://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Lustre+Support+Matrix>
> it mentions ZFS version 2.2.3 for the 2.16 release.
>
> However, at
> https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el9.4/server/RPMS/x86_64/ <https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el9.4/server/RPMS/x86_64/>
> only the 2.1.15 ZFS release is present.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that the wiki is wrong, and that we should be using the ZFS 2.1.15 with Rocky 9.4 and Lustre 2.16?
>
> Or is there a missing ZFS 2.2.3 package somewhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Alastair.
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org>
>
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org>