[lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Testing Lustre

Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] darby.vicker-1 at nasa.gov
Thu Jun 5 07:03:04 PDT 2025


I’d recommend io500 for benchmarking the performance of your lustre filesystem.

https://io500.org/

From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of Dmitry Ganyushin via lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 at 8:05 AM
To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] [lustre-discuss] Testing Lustre
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA.  Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.  Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC.


Dear Lustre Community,

I have a question regarding Lustre testing procedures. I have a small test
Lustre file system installed, and I would like to run a few formal tests to be
sure that things are built and configured correctly.

I tried to run the sanity test from the repo using auster, but it looks like the
sanity test tries to build a test file system from scratch including formatting
and other steps which I already have done myself.  I am wondering if it were
possible to set up test configs in a way that only the testing part will be
executed without initialization.

I can comment out the Lustre initialization functions in the test scripts,
and that works for a majority of sanity tests, but I am looking for a less invasive solution.

Thanks in advance for your help

Dmitry Ganyushin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20250605/1eb904f4/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list