[lustre-discuss] status of LU-18071
Andreas Dilger
adilger at thelustrecollective.com
Tue Feb 24 13:39:14 PST 2026
On 2025-02-04T16:27:12 Takeshi Nakazato <takeshi.nakazato at nao.ac.jp> wrote:
> I would like to ask about the status of LU-18071.
>
> https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-18071
>
> I'm asking this because, as a user, I encountered a dead-lock issue when I was working on the data analysis server based on Rocky 8, and system administrator implied that the issue is somehow related to this ticket.
>
> Regarding the ticket, the patch has been provided in August last year. But there is no update since then. Since I'm not familiar with the development procedure of Lustre, I was wondering if you could provide an information on how this ticket is handled after you have patch. Also, it would be really helpful if you could give a prospect for the inclusion of the patch into production release.
>
> Thank you very much for your cooperation.
The patch referenced in LU-18071 is actually a backport of a patch from
LU-17871 that was landed on master. Unfortunately, the LU-18071 patch
was not submitted correctly and was not updated so that it could land.
I've backported a new copy as patch https://review.whamcloud.com/64219
("LU-17871 ldlm: FLOCK ownlocks may be not set") to b2_15 that has proper
attribution of the original patch. I have no estimation when it may be
landed to b2_15 or included into a release tag.
That said, Lustre is an open source project, and you are free to apply
patches in your tree even before it is included in a "production release".
This is particularly true if you are building your own packages, since you
do not need to wait for a vendor to supply a new build if a patch exists.
Whether a patch is in a "production release" is somewhat in the eye of the
beholder - if it fixes a problem you are hitting, then it is better than
not fixing the problem, regardless of whether it is in a tagged version...
If you are using a vendor release on your servers, then your question is
better directed to their representatives.
Cheers, Andreas
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list