<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I have migrated to IOR for maximal and special case byte-rate
performance in writing from an MPI job.<br>
<br>
In the benchmarking discussion, some people are interested in file
opens, accesses and other types of operations metrics, for which they
have other utilities.<br>
<br>
Marty Barnaby<br>
<br>
<br>
Dhruv wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:4d94d97b-ef69-436c-892f-57fb320dded8@r37g2000prm.googlegroups.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have used IOR and sg_dd.
IOR gives more flexibility and options
On Jul 2, 11:42 am, Atul Vidwansa <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Atul.Vidwa...@Sun.COM"><Atul.Vidwa...@Sun.COM></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I wanted to know Lustre users choice of benchmarks? Which tool do you
often use to evaluate performance of Lustre?
Cheers,
-Atul
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lustre-disc...@lists.lustre.orghttp://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss">Lustre-disc...@lists.lustre.orghttp://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org">Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss">http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>