<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but that seems a bit
      large of an MDT. Of course drives these days are pretty good
      sized, so the extra is probably very inexpensive.</p>
    <p>Also, isn't it better to have 1 OST per OSS for parallelism
      rather than adding OSTs to an OSS? I've been doing most of my OSTs
      as ZFS and letting that handle parallel writes across drives
      within an OSS, which has performed well.</p>
    <p>Brian Andrus<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/30/2017 12:04 PM, Amjad Syed
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJWdRQikz6iOtUOS8nyG8WVj3F7YscQiWtUJ4W1xWxeu7osjhQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">The vendor has proposed a single MDT  ( 4 * 1.2 TB)
        in RAID 10 configuration.
        <div>The OST will be RAID 6  and proposed are 2 OST.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Ben
          Evans <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bevans@cray.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">bevans@cray.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div
style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
              <div>How many OST's are behind that OSS?  How many MDT's
                behind the MDS?</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <span id="m_-9082209549072038056OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
                <div
style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium
                  none;BORDER-LEFT:medium
none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df
                  1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>lustre-discuss
                  <<a
                    href="mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces@lists.lustre.org"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lustre-discuss-bounces@lists.<wbr>lustre.org</a>>
                  on behalf of Brian Andrus <<a
                    href="mailto:toomuchit@gmail.com" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">toomuchit@gmail.com</a>><br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday,
                  October 30, 2017 at 12:24 PM<br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a
                    href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.<wbr>org</a>"
                  <<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.<wbr>org</a>><br>
                  <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
                  [lustre-discuss] 1 MDS and 1 OSS<br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div class="h5">
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                        <p>Hmm. That is an odd one from a quick
                          thought...</p>
                        <p>However, IF you are planning on growing and
                          adding OSSes/OSTs, this is not a bad way to
                          get started and used to how everything works.
                          It is basically a single stripe storage.</p>
                        <p>If you are not planning on growing, I would
                          lean towards gluster on 2 boxes. I do that
                          often, actually. A single MDS/OSS has zero
                          redundancy, unless something is being done at
                          harware level and that would help in
                          availability.<br>
                          NFS is quite viable too, but you would be
                          splitting the available storage on 2 boxes.</p>
                        <p>Brian Andrus<br>
                        </p>
                        <p><br>
                        </p>
                        <br>
                        <div
                          class="m_-9082209549072038056moz-cite-prefix">On
                          10/30/2017 12:47 AM, Amjad Syed wrote:<br>
                        </div>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <div dir="ltr">Hello
                            <div>We are in process in procuring one
                              small Lustre filesystem giving us 120 TB 
                              of storage using Lustre 2.X.</div>
                            <div>The vendor has proposed only 1 MDS and
                              1 OSS as a solution.</div>
                            <div>The query we have is that is this
                              configuration enough , or we need more
                              OSS?</div>
                            <div>The MDS and OSS server are identical 
                              with regards to RAM (64 GB) and  HDD
                              (300GB)</div>
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Thanks</div>
                            <div>Majid</div>
                          </div>
                          <br>
                          <fieldset
                            class="m_-9082209549072038056mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                          <br>
                          <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
<a class="m_-9082209549072038056moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.<wbr>org</a><a class="m_-9082209549072038056moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.lustre.org/<wbr>listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-<wbr>lustre.org</a></pre>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </span>
            </div>
            <br>
            ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
            lustre-discuss mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.<wbr>org</a><br>
            <a
              href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org"
              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.lustre.org/<wbr>listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-<wbr>lustre.org</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>