<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Yes, if the IO500 is representing a use case where the file size or block count must be correct, then LSoM can’t be used. However, the IO500 can be changed by consensus and perhaps there is a reason to include a use case which fits LSoM?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If so, the IO500 could be changed to allow `lfs find` and it in-turn could be used to get LSoM info as Andreas pointed out in his comment of LU-9538:
<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9538?focusedCommentId=230392&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-230392">
https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9538?focusedCommentId=230392&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-230392</a> .<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Cory<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">lustre-devel <lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 11:50 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>John Bent <johnbent@gmail.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>, "lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [lustre-devel] MDT test in rel2.11<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in">
Lazy SoM is not landed yet, and it won’t be improving benchmark scores - it’s never “known 100% correct”, so it can’t be used for actual POSIX ops - if a file size read out is used for a write offset, then you’ve got data corruption.<br>
<br>
So for now it’s strictly limited to tools that know about it (accessed via an ioctl) and can accept information that may be stale. The intended use case is scanning the FS for policy application.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:center">
<hr size="0" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="color:black">From:</span></b><span style="color:black"> John Bent <johnbent@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 17, 2018 10:55:24 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Patrick Farrell<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Abe Asraoui; lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [lustre-devel] MDT test in rel2.11</span> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">I'm curious about how DOM improves IO500 scores. :)
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Also LSOM but I don't know actually whether that's in 2.11 or where.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Patrick Farrell <<a href="mailto:paf@cray.com" target="_blank">paf@cray.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in">
<br>
Abe,<br>
<br>
Any benchmarking would be highly dependent on hardware, both client and server. Is there a particular comparison (say, between versions) you’re interested in or something you’re concerned about?<br>
<br>
- Patrick<o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:center">
<hr size="0" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<div id="x_m_7805051326561734487divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="color:black">From:</span></b><span style="color:black"> lustre-devel <<a href="mailto:lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org</a>> on behalf of
Abe Asraoui <<a href="mailto:AbeA@supermicro.com" target="_blank">AbeA@supermicro.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 17, 2018 9:23:10 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org</a>;
<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a>; Abe Asraoui<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [lustre-devel] MDT test in rel2.11</span> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Hi All,<br>
<br>
<br>
Has anyone done any MDT testing under the latest rel2.11 and have benchmark data to share?<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Abe<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lustre-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org" target="_blank">http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in">
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lustre-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org">lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org" target="_blank">http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>