<div dir="ltr">Thanks for the link! I'll spin up a test system with 2.12.0 and see what breaks.<div>-Nate</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:20 PM Peter Jones <<a href="mailto:pjones@whamcloud.com">pjones@whamcloud.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-CA">
<div class="gmail-m_-4047772885545551574WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Nathan<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can
see the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12" target="_blank">
https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12</a> . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient”
</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"">☺</span><span lang="EN-US"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Peter<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Nathan R Crawford <<a href="mailto:nrcrawfo@uci.edu" target="_blank">nrcrawfo@uci.edu</a>><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>"<a href="mailto:nathan.crawford@uci.edu" target="_blank">nathan.crawford@uci.edu</a>" <<a href="mailto:nathan.crawford@uci.edu" target="_blank">nathan.crawford@uci.edu</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Peter Jones <<a href="mailto:pjones@whamcloud.com" target="_blank">pjones@whamcloud.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Peter, <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch (<a href="https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12" target="_blank">https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12</a>)
has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started appearing on b2_10 after a week or so.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> "Be patient" is an acceptable response :)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-Nate<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <<a href="mailto:pjones@whamcloud.com" target="_blank">pjones@whamcloud.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an interim development
build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for production purposes.<br>
<br>
On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" <<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss-bounces@lists.lustre.org</a> on behalf of
<a href="mailto:melchers@zedat.fu-berlin.de" target="_blank">melchers@zedat.fu-berlin.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which version should<br>
i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System?<br>
<br>
Mit freundlichen Grüßen<br>
Bernd Melchers<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Archiv- und Backup-Service | <a href="mailto:fab-service@zedat.fu-berlin.de" target="_blank">
fab-service@zedat.fu-berlin.de</a><br>
Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lustre-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org" target="_blank">
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lustre-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" target="_blank">lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org" target="_blank">http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<pre>Dr. Nathan Crawford <a href="mailto:nathan.crawford@uci.edu" target="_blank">nathan.crawford@uci.edu</a><u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Modeling Facility Director<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Department of Chemistry<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508<u></u><u></u></pre>
<pre>Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA<u></u><u></u></pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><pre>Dr. Nathan Crawford <a href="mailto:nathan.crawford@uci.edu" target="_blank">nathan.crawford@uci.edu</a>
Modeling Facility Director
Department of Chemistry
1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II
University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508
Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA</pre></div></div>