[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.8.0 and 2.9.0 failed to build for kernel 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64

Thome, Pedro (R&D Center - Brazil) pedro-henrique.cheruti-thome at hpe.com
Mon Mar 20 12:22:19 UTC 2017


Hi

I tried to install lustre 2.8.0 and 2.9.0 on a Centos 7.3 system and got this error:

Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/lustre-client/2.9.0/build/make.log for more information.

I attached the installation output and the make.log as well.

I switched from 2.8.0 to 2.9.0 since 2.9.0 is the one that support this kernel.

Thanks,
Pedro Thomé
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss_lists.lustre.org/attachments/20170320/63f96836/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
Installing Lustre Client
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
No plugin match for: refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package lustre-client-dkms.noarch 0:2.9.0-1.el7 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/expect for package: lustre-client-dkms-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch
--> Running transaction check
---> Package expect.x86_64 0:5.45-14.el7_1 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

================================================================================
 Package                  Arch         Version               Repository    Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 lustre-client-dkms       noarch       2.9.0-1.el7           CST           12 M
Installing for dependencies:
 expect                   x86_64       5.45-14.el7_1         OS_DVD       262 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)

Total download size: 12 M
Installed size: 34 M
Downloading packages:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                              102 MB/s |  12 MB  00:00     
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : expect-5.45-14.el7_1.x86_64                                  1/2 
  Installing : lustre-client-dkms-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch                        2/2 
Loading new lustre-client-2.9.0 DKMS files...
Building for 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64
Building initial module for 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/lustre-client/2.9.0/build/make.log for more information.
warning: %post(lustre-client-dkms-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 10
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package lustre-client-dkms-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch
  Verifying  : lustre-client-dkms-2.9.0-1.el7.noarch                        1/2 
  Verifying  : expect-5.45-14.el7_1.x86_64                                  2/2 

Installed:
  lustre-client-dkms.noarch 0:2.9.0-1.el7                                       

Dependency Installed:
  expect.x86_64 0:5.45-14.el7_1                                                 

Complete!

Rebuilding Lustre kernel modules using MOFED's ofa_kernel...

Removing old lustre-client-2.9.0 DKMS files...

------------------------------
Deleting module version: 2.9.0
completely from the DKMS tree.
------------------------------
Done.
Loading new lustre-client-2.9.0 DKMS files...
Building for 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64
Building initial module for 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/lustre-client/2.9.0/build/make.log for more information.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: make.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22584 bytes
Desc: make.log
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss_lists.lustre.org/attachments/20170320/63f96836/attachment.bin>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list