<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [Lustre-discuss] Announce: Lustre 1.6.5 is available!</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3354" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText37702 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Thanks, Jeff. I've been hoping to try this, so I will give your bundle a shot in the morning and let you know how it goes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>--Joe</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> lustre-discuss-bounces@lists.lustre.org on behalf of Jeff Blasius<BR><B>Sent:</B> Mon 6/16/2008 11:06 PM<BR><B>To:</B> David Brown; Terry Rutledge; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Lustre-discuss] Announce: Lustre 1.6.5 is available!<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>For those who are asking, I was able to build OFED 1.3.1 against the<BR>1.6.5 release (after some hacking of the process). Considering centos<BR>5.2 (with OFED 1.3) isn't released yet, someone might find it useful.<BR>Of course no warranties or guarantees :).<BR><BR><A href="http://research.yale.edu/hpc/OFED_1.3.1_lustre_1.6.5.tar.gz">http://research.yale.edu/hpc/OFED_1.3.1_lustre_1.6.5.tar.gz</A><BR>(Redhat 5.1, lustre 1.6.5, x86_64)<BR><BR>By the way, are lustre kernels tested for compatibility with the<BR>latest OFED? This seemed to be more work than usual.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR> jeff<BR><BR>On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell@sun.com> wrote:<BR>> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:08 -0700, David Brown wrote:<BR>>> Uhm, what happened to the infiniband support in the cfs kernel rpms?<BR>>> 1.6.4.3 had infiniband support but the drivers aren't there for the<BR>>> 1.6.5 versions for rhel5.<BR>><BR>> Starting with 1.6.5 we are supporting the "out-of-[vendor-]tree" OFED<BR>> drivers. 1.6.5 is supposed to ship with the OFED 1.3 kernel-ib (and<BR>> -devel) RPMs and the Lustre ko2iblnd kernel module built likewise. You<BR>> should have the ko2iblnd module in the lustre-modules RPM. You are just<BR>> missing the needed kernel-ib RPM.<BR>><BR>> Terry, any idea why the kernel-ib and kernel-ib-devel RPMs didn't make<BR>> it up to the SDLC?<BR>><BR>> b.<BR>><BR>><BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Lustre-discuss mailing list<BR>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<BR>> <A href="http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss">http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss</A><BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>Jeff Blasius / jeff.blasius@yale.edu<BR>Phone: (203)432-9940 51 Prospect Rm. 011<BR>High Performance Computing (HPC)<BR>UNIX Systems Administrator, Linux Systems Design & Support (LSDS)<BR>Yale University Information Technology Services (ITS)<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Lustre-discuss mailing list<BR>Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<BR><A href="http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss">http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>