[Lustre-devel] moving /proc to $MNT/.lustre

Alex Zhuravlev Alex.Zhuravlev at Sun.COM
Mon Jan 7 10:10:28 PST 2008

Nathan Rutman wrote:
> well, that's why I asked.  As I said, Andreas and I are in agreement, 
> and it certainly makes sense from a portability point of view, as well 
> as consistency with future features (snapshots, audit logs, etc.), and 
> the final elimination of our various /proc locking headaches.  But yes, 
> it would break user's scripts  - that's a 1-time thing, and I think not 
> too terrible.

it's not quite clear how do we do with userspace servers. there was an idea
to use named pipes, but I'm not sure it's very portable.

thanks, Alex

More information about the lustre-devel mailing list