[Lustre-devel] [wc-discuss] Some questions about Lustre test configuration
kelly.zhang at emc.com
kelly.zhang at emc.com
Fri Mar 23 05:55:06 PDT 2012
Got it. Thank you so much, Robert.
Best Regards,
Kelly Zhang(EMC)
From: Robert Read [mailto:rread at whamcloud.com]
Sent: 2012年3月23日 1:28
To: Zhang, Kelly
Cc: wc-discuss at whamcloud.com; lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org; Tang, Haiying; Liu, Xuezhao; Peng, Tao
Subject: Re: [wc-discuss] Some questions about Lustre test configuration
Hi,
On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:08 , <kelly.zhang at emc.com<mailto:kelly.zhang at emc.com>> <kelly.zhang at emc.com<mailto:kelly.zhang at emc.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have some questions about Lustre test configuration, would somebody help on this? Thanks a lot.
1. Seen from the test sets of Maloo, typically four nodes are used: “Client1, Client2, MDS1, OSS(includes 7 OSTs)”.
So in a normal regression testing, we can also follow this, right?
When four nodes are used, what value do you set for the following two variables in file cfg/local.sh:
mdsfailover_HOST and ostfailover_HOST
In the this configuration, I believe the failover hosts should be set to nonfailover hosts:
mdsfailover_HOST=${mds_HOST}
ostfailover_HOST=${ost_HOST}
This will allow the recovery tests to do simulated failover by ummounting and and mounting the targets on the same node to trigger Lustre recovery.
2. I see that in the PDF “Lustre 2.2 Test Plan”, these are some links introducing about the test configuration. Like the following one:
Regression Testing
Use auster to run automated regression tests with the following configurations.
http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/ENG/Auster .
But we failed to access this kind of link. Is this URL public to users outside Whamcloud?
It wasn't (oops), but I just moved it so it it is now accessible to everyone here:
http://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Auster
cheers,
robert
Thanks & Best Regards,
Kelly Zhang(EMC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20120323/09515863/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list