[lustre-devel] (no subject)

[Amir Shehata]

lctl usage is kept for backwards compatibility. Eventually, we should be
moving to using lnetctl exclusively. Which lustre-release we should do that
in, is the question. 2.10?

thanks
amir

On 4 January 2017 at 16:16, Di Natale, Giuseppe <dinatale2 at llnl.gov> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I am attempting to port the SysV lnet script as part of a transition to
> systemd. I ran into the following in lustre/scripts/lnet:
>
>         if [ -x $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY -a -f
> "$LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_FILE" ]; then
>                 $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY lnet configure || exit 1
>         else
>                 lctl network up || exit 1
>         fi
>
> Can the check for LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY  (/usr/sbin/lnetctl by
> default) be removed so that way lnetctl is used exclusively?
>
> Thanks,
> Giuseppe Di Natale
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20170110/8d4158a6/attachment.htm>