[Lustre-discuss] Hardware Question
Lundgren, Andrew
Andrew.Lundgren at Level3.com
Wed Oct 10 08:40:25 PDT 2007
As RH 5.1 will support 16TB ext3 partitions, will lustre inherit that
functionality?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss-bounces at clusterfs.com
> [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at clusterfs.com] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Dilger
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:26 AM
> To: Aaron Knister
> Cc: lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Hardware Question
>
> On Oct 06, 2007 10:28 -0400, Aaron Knister wrote:
> > Oh, right I forgot about that. Well...if i had an 8tb lun
> and split it
> > into 2 volume groups using LVM do you think the performance
> would be
> > worse than making 2 raids at the hardware level?
>
> Well, it won't be doing the disks any favours, since you'll
> now have contention between the OSTs, and the kernel will be
> doing a poor job with the IO elevator decisions. I would
> suggest making 2 smaller RAID LUNs instead.
>
> In the end it is up to you to decide if the IO performance is
> acceptable.
> You can do some testing using lustre-iokit to see what the
> component device performance is.
>
> > On Oct 5, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >
> > >On Oct 05, 2007 13:14 -0400, Aaron Knister wrote:
> > >>Make that 6x 9.7TB luns.
> > >
> > >Lustre (== ext3) doesn't support >= 8TB LUNs.
> >
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Principal Software Engineer
> Cluster File Systems, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list