[Lustre-discuss] Failover without shared storage

[Brock Palen]

This is a interesting question,  Has DRBD ever been explored on this  
list?  It wouldn't work for very large clusters, but for moderate size?

Brock Palen
Center for Advanced Computing
brockp at umich.edu
(734)936-1985


On Oct 25, 2007, at 6:05 PM, José M. Martín wrote:

> Hi,
>
> is there any way to implement failnode pairs without shared storage? I
> mean, two nodes with two syncronized separated hard disk and if one  
> node
> fails, the other one starts to work.
>
> Thanks in avant,
>
> José
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>