[Lustre-discuss] Failover without shared storage

Andreas Dilger adilger at sun.com
Thu Oct 25 15:26:49 PDT 2007


On Oct 26, 2007  00:05 +0200, Jos� M. Mart�n wrote:
> is there any way to implement failnode pairs without shared storage? I 
> mean, two nodes with two syncronized separated hard disk and if one node 
> fails, the other one starts to work.

Some people have reported using GNBD or other replicating block devices
in the list.  You may find some information in the list archives.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list