[Lustre-discuss] Nodes claim error with files, then say everything is fine.

[Brian J. Murrell]

dOn Wed, 2008-08-06 at 12:11 -0600, Chris Worley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > +rpctrace debug is probably the way to go to see what the client
> > are(n't) doing in terms of keeping the MDS aware of it's existence.
> >
> 
> The log from the client perspective starts with a lot of packet mismatches:
> 
> 00000100:00020000:3:1217629906.902955:0:5592:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback())
> early reply sized 176, expect 128
> 00000100:00020000:3:1217633409.730495:0:5590:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback())
> early reply sized 240, expect 128

Given the amount of debug provided, this looks like it could be bug
16534 which is on my plate to test the solution for and land.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080806/d3bd4860/attachment.pgp>