[Lustre-discuss] stata_mv mv_stata which is better?
Mike Berg
mike.berg at sun.com
Thu Aug 7 11:11:12 PDT 2008
Brock,
It is recommended that mv_sata is used on the x4500.
It has been a while since I have built this up myself and a few Lustre
releases back but I do understand the pain. I hope that with Lustre
1.6.5.1 on RHEL 4.5 you can just build mv_sata against the provided
Lustre kernel and alias it accordingly in modprobe.conf and create a
new initrd, then update grub. I don't have gear handy to give it try
unfortunately. Please let me know your experiences with this if you
pursue it.
Enclosed is a somewhat dated document on what we have found to be the
best configuration of the x4500 for use with Lustre. Ignore the N1SM
parts. We optimized for performance and RAS with some sacrifices on
capacity. Hopefully this is a useful reference.
Regards,
Mike Berg
Sr. Lustre Solutions Engineer
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Office/Fax: (303) 547-3491
E-mail: Mike.Berg at Sun.Com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: X4500-preparation.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 320945 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080807/447adfc0/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
On Aug 6, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Brock Palen wrote:
> Is it still worth the effort to try and build mv_stata? when working
> with an x4500?
> stata_mv from RHEL4 does not appear to show some of the stability
> problems discussed online before.
>
> I am curious because the build system sun provides with the driver
> does not play nicely with the lustre kernel source packaging.
>
> If it is worth all the pain, if others have already figured it out.
> Any help would be grateful.
>
>
> Brock Palen
> www.umich.edu/~brockp
> Center for Advanced Computing
> brockp at umich.edu
> (734)936-1985
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list