[Lustre-discuss] Lustre Falling over

[Charles Taylor]

It is just a confidence/testing issue.    Since 1.6.4.1 is not a "bug- 
fix only" release, it will be essentially untested for us.   Since we  
run a production cluster, this is not acceptable.   We put 1.6.3 into  
service originally without the thorough testing it needed and we were  
*VERY* sorry.   Applying a specific patch to a known code base is a  
good bit safer though not foolproof.

Charlie Taylor
UF HPC Center

On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:

> On Friday 11 January 2008 10:51:34 am Wojciech Turek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes I came with same conclusion. I have tried to apply patches from
>> this bug but patching process has FAILED.
>
> This may be a little off-topic, but since patches for bug #13917 have
> been included in 1.6.4.1, is manually patching really worth the  
> hassle?
> Unless you have a specific reason to stick with 1.6.3, of course.
>
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Kilian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss