[Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file system?

[Kennedy, Jeffrey]

Any spec's on IOPS rather than throughput?

Thanks.

Jeff Kennedy
QCT Engineering Compute
858-651-6592
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss-bounces at clusterfs.com [mailto:lustre-discuss-
> bounces at clusterfs.com] On Behalf Of Canon, Richard Shane
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:49 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file
> system?
> 
> 
> Klaus,
> 
> Here are some that I know are pretty large.
> 
> * RedStorm - I think it has two roughly 50 GB/s file systems.  The
> capacity may not be quite as large though.  I think they used FC
drives.
> It was DDN 8500 although that may have changed.
> * CEA - I think they have a file system approaching 100 GB/s.  I think
> it is DDN 9550.  Not sure about the capacities.
> * TACC has a large Thumper based system.  Not sure of the specs.
> * ORNL - We have a 44 GB/s file system with around 800 TB of total
> capacity.  That is DDN 9550.  We also have two new file system (20
GB/s
> and 10 GB/s currently LSI XBB2 and DDN 9550 respectively).  Those have
> around 800 TB each (after RAID6).
> * We are planning a 200 GB/s, around 10 PB file system now.
> 
> --Shane
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss-bounces at clusterfs.com
> [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at clusterfs.com] On Behalf Of D. Marc
> Stearman
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:37 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file
> system?
> 
> Klaus,
> 
> We currently have a 1.2PB lustre filesystem that we will be expanding
> to 2.4PB in the near future.  I not sure about the highest sustained
> IOPS, but we did have a user peak 19GB/s to one of our 500TB
> filesystems recently. The backend for that was 16 DDN 8500 couplets
> with write-cache turned OFF.
> 
> -Marc
> 
> ----
> D. Marc Stearman
> LC Lustre Systems Administrator
> marc at llnl.gov
> 925.423.9670
> Pager: 1.888.203.0641
> 
> 
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Klaus Steden wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I was asked by a friend of a business contact of mine the other day
> > to share
> > some information about Lustre; seems he's planning to build what
will
> > eventually be about a 3 PB file system.
> >
> > The CFS website doesn't appear to have any information on field
> > deployments
> > worth bragging about, so I figured I'd ask, just for fun; does
> > anyone know:
> >
> > - the size of the largest working Lustre file system currently in
> > the field
> > - the highest sustained number of IOPS seen with Lustre, and what
the
> > backend was?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Klaus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lustre-discuss mailing list
> > Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss