[Lustre-discuss] socknal_sd00 100% lower?

Brock Palen brockp at umich.edu
Fri Mar 7 09:35:28 PST 2008


> Brock,
>
>> The servers are dual cpu systems.  But I only see a single  
>> socknal_sd  thread.
>>
> It can't be so. Please provide output of 'ps aux | grep socknal'  
> and 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'.

You are right:

root      3171  2.3  0.0     0    0 ?        R    Jan10 1934:02  
[socknal_sd00]
root      3172  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_sd01]
root      3173  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_cd00]
root      3174  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_cd01]
root      3175  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_cd02]
root      3176  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_cd03]
root      3177  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        S    Jan10   0:00  
[socknal_reaper]
brockp    4749  0.0  0.0 51100  700 pts/0    S+   12:33   0:00 grep  
sockn

Notice the amount of cpu time given to sd00  and how sd01 has done  
nothing.  What could cause this?


brockp at nyx167 ~]$ grep Proc /proc/cpuinfo
model name      : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240
model name      : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240



>
> Sincerely,
> Maxim
>
>




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list