[Lustre-discuss] socknal_sd00 100% lower?
Brock Palen
brockp at umich.edu
Fri Mar 7 09:35:28 PST 2008
> Brock,
>
>> The servers are dual cpu systems. But I only see a single
>> socknal_sd thread.
>>
> It can't be so. Please provide output of 'ps aux | grep socknal'
> and 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'.
You are right:
root 3171 2.3 0.0 0 0 ? R Jan10 1934:02
[socknal_sd00]
root 3172 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_sd01]
root 3173 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_cd00]
root 3174 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_cd01]
root 3175 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_cd02]
root 3176 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_cd03]
root 3177 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan10 0:00
[socknal_reaper]
brockp 4749 0.0 0.0 51100 700 pts/0 S+ 12:33 0:00 grep
sockn
Notice the amount of cpu time given to sd00 and how sd01 has done
nothing. What could cause this?
brockp at nyx167 ~]$ grep Proc /proc/cpuinfo
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 240
>
> Sincerely,
> Maxim
>
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list