[Lustre-discuss] OSS not healty
Frank Mietke
frank.mietke at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Thu Mar 13 06:55:25 PDT 2008
Brian,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:34 +0100, Frank Mietke wrote:
>
> > okay I've found the following in /var/log/messages before the bulk of above
> > messages come. It seems that something with the RAID went wrong.
>
> I don't see anything RAID specific however...
you're right, my mistake.
>
> > Mar 13 06:17:31 chic2e24 kernel: [3068633.701448] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > Mar 13 06:17:31 chic2e24 kernel: [3068633.701454] sda: rw=1, want=11287722456, limit=7796867072
>
> This is pretty self-explanatory. Something tried to read beyond the end
> of the disk. Something has a misunderstanding of how big the disk is.
That's it why I'm asking.
> Is it possible that the disk format process was misled about the disk
> size during initialization?
>
> Andreas, does mkfs do any bounds checking to verify the sanity of the
> mkfs request? I.e. does it make sure that if/when you specify a number
> of blocks for a filesystem that that many block are available?
>
> Frank, is it at all possible that the size of the device had somehow
> gotten smaller since you first initialized it?
I think, no, because all the other OSTs show the same size. Is there a way to
request the assumptions of disk size from the MGS/MDS?
Frank
--
Dipl.-Inf. Frank Mietke | Fakultätsrechen- und Informationszentrum
Tel.: 0371 - 531 - 35538 | Fak. für Informatik
Fax: 0371 - 531 8 35538 | TU-Chemnitz
Key-ID: 60F59599 | frank.mietke at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list