[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5.1 patches

JD Neumann Jd.Neumann at Sun.COM
Mon Nov 3 06:08:23 PST 2008


I will check on this and see why it was not sent.
J.D.

Wojciech Turek wrote:
> Indeed you right! I used to get messages from lustre-announce list 
> about such events but it seems it didn't work this time.
>
> Thanks
>
> JD Neumann wrote:
>> !.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center.
>> J.D.
>>
>> Wojciech Turek wrote:
>>> I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 
>>> servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new 
>>> lustre version. I noticed that some people talk  about testing beta 
>>> version of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc 
>>> version of 1.6.6 ?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Mag Gam wrote:
>>>> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem
>>>> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems
>>>> aren't occuring anymore!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> On Oct 11, 2008  12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 
>>>>>> 1.6.5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the
>>>>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data
>>>>>>> corruption?
>>>>>>>         
>>>>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our
>>>>> QA process.  In general there should never be any chance of data 
>>>>> corruption
>>>>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there
>>>>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would 
>>>>> explicitly
>>>>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Andreas Dilger
>>>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
>>>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>>>   
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>>   
>>
>




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list