[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5.1 patches

[Peter Jones]

JD

I think that the announcement will go out shortly. The individual 
responsible for sending out the notice is on Pacific time and is not in 
the office yet. This upload to SDLC only just completed over the weekend.

Regards

PJones

JD Neumann wrote:
> I will check on this and see why it was not sent.
> J.D.
>
> Wojciech Turek wrote:
>   
>> Indeed you right! I used to get messages from lustre-announce list 
>> about such events but it seems it didn't work this time.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> JD Neumann wrote:
>>     
>>> !.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center.
>>> J.D.
>>>
>>> Wojciech Turek wrote:
>>>       
>>>> I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 
>>>> servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new 
>>>> lustre version. I noticed that some people talk  about testing beta 
>>>> version of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc 
>>>> version of 1.6.6 ?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mag Gam wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem
>>>>> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems
>>>>> aren't occuring anymore!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On Oct 11, 2008  12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 
>>>>>>> 1.6.5.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the
>>>>>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data
>>>>>>>> corruption?
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our
>>>>>> QA process.  In general there should never be any chance of data 
>>>>>> corruption
>>>>>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there
>>>>>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would 
>>>>>> explicitly
>>>>>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Andreas Dilger
>>>>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
>>>>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>>>>   
>>>>>           
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>>>   
>>>>         
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>