[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5 MOUNT problem?

Brian J. Murrell Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Thu Oct 30 06:38:12 PDT 2008

On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 06:03 -0700, Johnlya wrote:
> I test it fowllowing:
> 1. mount -t lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
>    result:
>    dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (rw)

As you would expect, yes?

> 2.mount.lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
>    result:
>    dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (0)
> Please tell me why?

Because mount.lustre is not really meant to be called directly but
rather as a helper for mount.  You could use strace on your "mount -t
lustre" command and see how it's calling mount.lustre to get some more

> Does it effect Lustre error and problem?

I'm not sure.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20081030/4a11ff75/attachment.pgp>

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list