[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5 MOUNT problem?
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Thu Oct 30 06:38:12 PDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 06:03 -0700, Johnlya wrote:
> I test it fowllowing:
> 1. mount -t lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
> dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (rw)
As you would expect, yes?
> 2.mount.lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
> dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (0)
> Please tell me why?
Because mount.lustre is not really meant to be called directly but
rather as a helper for mount. You could use strace on your "mount -t
lustre" command and see how it's calling mount.lustre to get some more
> Does it effect Lustre error and problem?
I'm not sure.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the lustre-discuss