[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5 MOUNT problem?
johnlya at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 19:26:23 PDT 2008
I found its explain "mount.lustre is used to start a Lustre client or
target service. This program should
not be called directly; rather it is a helper program invoked through
mount(8)." in Manual. This is the same that you said.
mount.lustre: “（0）” it can be think of "(rw)", but it doesn't mount
So I think that Lustre should prevent users from call directly the
command "mount.lustre". Like as the command "mount.smbfs" is not
On Thu, 2008-10-30, at 21:38, "Brian J. Murrell"
<Brian.Murr... at Sun.COM> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 06:03 -0700, Johnlya wrote:
> > I test it fowllowing:
> > 1. mount -t lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
> > result:
> > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (rw)
> As you would expect, yes?
> > 2.mount.lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt
> > result:
> > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (0)
> > Please tell me why?
> Because mount.lustre is not really meant to be called directly but
> rather as a helper for mount. You could use strace on your "mount -t
> lustre" command and see how it's calling mount.lustre to get some more
> > Does it effect Lustre error and problem?
> I'm not sure.
> < 1KViewDownload
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-disc... at lists.lustre.orghttp://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
More information about the lustre-discuss