[Lustre-discuss] Which partition to choose for mkfs.lustre
Gnanasekar Loganathan
l.gnanasekar at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 20:38:28 PDT 2009
Thanks brain.!I'll try my best level and come back with good result.
Thanks,
Gnana
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com>wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:44 +0530, Gnanasekar Loganathan wrote:
> > Hi Brain,
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > [root at SF_02 ~]# rpm -qa | grep e2fs
> > e2fsprogs-1.35-12.17.el4
> > e2fsprogs-devel-1.35-12.17.el4
> > e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat
> > e2fsprogs-1.35-12.17.el4
>
> Why do you have 3 e2fsprogs packages installed? How did you manage to
> do that? If you used "rpm -i" rpm should have complained that you
> already had e2fsprogs installed and if you used "rpm -U" it should have
> installed e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat and removed
> e2fsprogs-1.35-12.17.el4.
>
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/sda1 * 2550 5000 19687657+ 83 Linux
> > /dev/sda2 5001 5383 3076447+ 82 Linux swap
> >
> >
> > I have only a 2 partitions on my system.
>
> Yes. /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2
>
> > If i run the command
> >
> >
> > 'mkfs.lustre --mdt --mgs --fsname=large-fs /dev/sda'
> >
> >
> > the system will crash/corrupt.
>
> Of course it will. You are overwriting /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2 (which
> are your system and swap devices) doing this. If you intend this
> machine to be an MDS, you need to format some other
> (than /dev/sda, /dev/sda1 or /dev/sda2) device. I think perhaps you are
> not quite understanding the architecture of Lustre. I think a review of
> the manual and probably the wiki will help you understand what the
> components of a Lustre system are and how to install them.
>
> b.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090428/0f188564/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list