[Lustre-discuss] Bad read performance
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Thu Aug 20 15:04:13 PDT 2009
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 23:52 +0200, Alvaro Aguilera wrote:
> I'm facing the following problem: when this code is run in parallel
> the read operations on certain processes start to need more and more
> time to complete. I attached a graphical trace of this, when using
> only 2 processes.
Just a (perhaps silly) question, but does the striping of the file (or
the directory the file is being created in) on the filesystem match your
I/O patterns? That is, ideally, each thread/rank/process (whatever you
want to call them) should be doing I/O in it's own stripe.
$ man lfs
if none of this is meaningful.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090820/75ae8df0/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list