[Lustre-discuss] mounting via cname

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:30 -0500, Robert Olson wrote:
> OK, thanks. I'm not entirely sure I want my fs mounts to rely on DNS  
> tho...

That's one way to look at it.  Another is that the resolution is only
needed at mount time, and what does work without a functioning DNS
anyway?  That's why it's usually wise to have slave servers.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090603/f28d80e4/attachment.pgp>