[Lustre-discuss] renamed directory retains a dentry under its old name?
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Thu Nov 19 05:34:59 PST 2009
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 21:09 +0800, Phil Schwan wrote:
> G'day Brian! Glad to see you've stuck around!
:-)
> It should be, except it isn't.
Don't ya just hate those?
> Your steps are correct, I believe (Stu
> may correct me), but we also tried that without any luck.
Hrm. Must be more subtle then.
Perhaps somebody else here might recognize those symptoms. Quite a few
releases have gone by since 1.6.6 so it's entirely possible it's been
fixed, as I am sure you realize. So let's see if this one rings a bell
with somebody.
In the meanwhile, if you come up with a reliable reproducer, feel free
to post it here and we can see if we can reproduce -- or not, in an
effort at least to see if it's been fixed already.
Cheers,
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20091119/2334add4/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list