[Lustre-discuss] slow direct_io , slow journal .. in OST log

[Lex]

Thank you for your fast reply, Aaron

I'm using Giga Ethernet to synchronize data between to our fail-over node.
Is there something wrong ? Tell me, please

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Knister <aaron.knister at gmail.com>wrote:

> My best guess (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is that those messages
> are because the underlying block devices are slow to respond to i/o
> requests. It looks like you're using DRBD. What's your interconnect?
>
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Lex wrote:
>
> Hi list
>
> I have one OSS with hadware info like this :
>
> CPU Intel(R) xeon E5420 2.5 Ghz
> Chipset intel 5000P
> 8GB RAM
>
> With this OSS, we using 2 RAID-5 arrays as OSTs ( each has 4 x 1.5 TB hard
> drive with RAID controller adaptec 5805 )
>
> I worked quite smooth before, but, about 2 weeks ago, in /var/log/messages,
> i saw many warning ( i thought so)  like this:
>
> *Jan 25 08:41:23 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9587:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 35s
> Jan 25 08:41:34 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9608:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 41s
> Jan 25 08:41:34 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9608:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) Skipped 2 previous
> similar messages
> Jan 25 08:41:35 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9645:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 43s
> Jan 25 08:58:10 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9646:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 31s
> Jan 25 08:59:39 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9609:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 30s
> Jan 25 09:01:05 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9587:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 33s
> Jan 25 09:03:23 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9633:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 32s
> Jan 25 09:11:25 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
> 9585:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow
> direct_io 36s*
>
> I googled around and found that it's because a problem with oss_num_threads
> and even though brought it down to 64 ( followed by the function i found in
> the 1.8 manual: thread_number = RAM * CPU core / 128 MB, its value is 256  )
>
>
> *options ost oss_num_threads=64*
>
> It still didn't help.
>
> I thought it was only the harmless warning but maybe wrong, our performance
> is goes down quite heavily ( it's maybe because of other reason, but for
> now, i am only doubting slow direct_io problem )
>
> iostat -m 1 1
> Linux 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5_lustre.1.8.0custom (OST6)      01/25/2010
>
> avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
>            0.01    0.02    2.86   25.01    0.00   72.10
>
> Device:            tps    MB_read/s    MB_wrtn/s    MB_read    MB_wrtn
> sda               1.30         0.01         0.00      11386       3469
> sdb               1.30         0.01         0.00      11531       3469
> sdc             131.50        *12.40*         0.26   11793218     249934
> sdd             178.46        *18.00*         0.26   17124065     250334
> md2               3.33         0.02         0.00      22915       2634
> md1               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
> md0               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
> drbd3           480.10        *12.39*         0.26   11789047     249639
> drbd6           565.85        *14.89*         0.26   14168452     249211
>
>
> So, could anyone please tell me whether it's warning impact our system
> performance or not ? and if it does, give me solution or advice to resolve
> it, please
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20100125/ea773cce/attachment.htm>