[Lustre-discuss] slow direct_io , slow journal .. in OST log

[Aaron Knister]

I don't necessarily think there's anything wrong with using drbd or running it over gigabit ethernet. If you stop all I/O to the lustre filesystem, what does an hdparm -t show on the sdc and drbd devices? Do you have any performance numbers for the drbd or underlying raid devices?

On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Lex wrote:

> Thank you for your fast reply, Aaron
> 
> I'm using Giga Ethernet to synchronize data between to our fail-over node. Is there something wrong ? Tell me, please 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Aaron Knister <aaron.knister at gmail.com> wrote:
> My best guess (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is that those messages are because the underlying block devices are slow to respond to i/o requests. It looks like you're using DRBD. What's your interconnect? 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Lex wrote:
> 
>> Hi list 
>> 
>> I have one OSS with hadware info like this : 
>> 
>> CPU Intel(R) xeon E5420 2.5 Ghz
>> Chipset intel 5000P 
>> 8GB RAM 
>> 
>> With this OSS, we using 2 RAID-5 arrays as OSTs ( each has 4 x 1.5 TB hard drive with RAID controller adaptec 5805 ) 
>> 
>> I worked quite smooth before, but, about 2 weeks ago, in /var/log/messages, i saw many warning ( i thought so)  like this: 
>> 
>> Jan 25 08:41:23 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9587:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 35s
>> Jan 25 08:41:34 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9608:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 41s
>> Jan 25 08:41:34 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9608:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) Skipped 2 previous similar messages
>> Jan 25 08:41:35 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9645:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 43s
>> Jan 25 08:58:10 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9646:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 31s
>> Jan 25 08:59:39 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9609:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 30s
>> Jan 25 09:01:05 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9587:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 33s
>> Jan 25 09:03:23 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9633:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 32s
>> Jan 25 09:11:25 OST6 kernel: Lustre: 9585:0:(filter_io_26.c:706:filter_commitrw_write()) lustre-OST0006: slow direct_io 36s
>> 
>> I googled around and found that it's because a problem with oss_num_threads and even though brought it down to 64 ( followed by the function i found in the 1.8 manual: thread_number = RAM * CPU core / 128 MB, its value is 256  ) 
>> 
>> options ost oss_num_threads=64
>> 
>> It still didn't help. 
>> 
>> I thought it was only the harmless warning but maybe wrong, our performance is goes down quite heavily ( it's maybe because of other reason, but for now, i am only doubting slow direct_io problem ) 
>> 
>> iostat -m 1 1
>> Linux 2.6.18-92.1.17.el5_lustre.1.8.0custom (OST6)      01/25/2010
>> 
>> avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
>>            0.01    0.02    2.86   25.01    0.00   72.10
>> 
>> Device:            tps    MB_read/s    MB_wrtn/s    MB_read    MB_wrtn
>> sda               1.30         0.01         0.00      11386       3469
>> sdb               1.30         0.01         0.00      11531       3469
>> sdc             131.50        12.40         0.26   11793218     249934
>> sdd             178.46        18.00         0.26   17124065     250334
>> md2               3.33         0.02         0.00      22915       2634
>> md1               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
>> md0               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
>> drbd3           480.10        12.39         0.26   11789047     249639
>> drbd6           565.85        14.89         0.26   14168452     249211
>> 
>> 
>> So, could anyone please tell me whether it's warning impact our system performance or not ? and if it does, give me solution or advice to resolve it, please 
>> 
>> Best regards 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20100124/cfea9034/attachment.htm>