[Lustre-discuss] slow direct_io , slow journal .. in OST log
Lex
lexluthor87 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 23:12:06 PST 2010
There was a problem with our raid controller this morning, raid array was
degraded ( I reinstalled the hard drive and its state was *rebuilding* right
after that ) and from messages log, i saw many warnings like this:
*Jan 26 13:59:13 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
9589:0:(filter.c:1363:filter_parent_lock()) lustre-OST0006: slow parent lock
49s
Jan 26 13:59:13 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
9589:0:(filter.c:1363:filter_parent_lock()) Skipped 10 previous similar
messages
Jan 26 13:59:13 OST6 kernel: Lustre:
9638:0:(filter_io.c:398:filter_preprw_read()) lustre-OST0006: slow
preprw_read setup 34s*
I have never seen *slow parent lock *or *preprw-read *before. Maybe
everything is going down fast and severely, Do all you guys have any ideas
for my situation ?
Just guess, i think it was impacted by performance decreasing issue during
rebuild raid array.
Best regards
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Lex <lexluthor87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Erik if i'm rising such a "bad" question, could u tell me more
>>> about
>>> OST journal device ? I even don't know what it is as well as haven't seen
>>> it
>>> before, in the lustre manual.
>>>
>>
>> an OST is an ext3-ish filesystem associated with some OST server
>> processes.
>> since it's basically ext3, the properties of ext3 apply, including the use
>> of a journal, and the ability to use an "external" journal device.
>>
>
> I think we don't have any separate or external journal device like you
> said. So could anyone tell me exactly what stuff make the warning about slow
> xxx in our OST logs like i described above is ? Is there any role of lustre
> in this situation ? And how? What is the relationship with journal device
> and my problem ?
>
> Best regards
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20100126/08e8a654/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list