[Lustre-discuss] Optimize parallel compilation on lustre

[Maxence Dunnewind]

> I just realized that in the patch I sent you, it defaults to "no change in behaviour" unless FOR_TESTING_ONLY is defined at compile time.  I didn't want someone using the patch and then complaining that their filesystem didn't work afterward.
> 
> I've attached an updated patch that has "#define FOR_TESTING_ONLY", and hopefully this one will make more of a difference in performance.
Ahah :)
I'll retry on monday then.

Maxence

-- 
Maxence DUNNEWIND
Contact : maxence at dunnewind.net
Site : http://www.dunnewind.net
06 32 39 39 93
GPG : 18AE 61E4 D0B0 1C7C AAC9  E40D 4D39 68DB 0D2E B533
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20100710/b2de6c9f/attachment.pgp>