[Lustre-discuss] Future of lustre 1.8.3+

[Guy Coates]

On 26/05/10 17:25, Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 16:48 +0100, Guy Coates wrote:
>
>>>> One thing to watch out for in your kernel configs is to make sure that:
>>>>
>>>> CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=N
>>>
>>> OK. But the question is if this issue still applies for lustre-1.8.3 and
>>> SLES kernel linux-2.6.27.39-0.3.1.tar.bz2. I mean, is quite surprising
>>> that if this problems persist, Oracle is offering lustre packages for
>>> SLES11 with CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y ???????
>>> I am just about to start testing, so I'd like to clarify this.
>>
>> The binary SLES packages are fine; it is the source packages that may be
>> problematic, depending on your config. There is a bug filed against this
>
> Sorry Guy. May be there is something I am missing, but SLES11 rpm kernel
> server packages for lustre-1.8.3 are created using a config with
> ONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y (See yourself on the attachement

You are entirely correct.

Cheers,

Guy

-- 
Dr Guy Coates,  Informatics System Group
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1HH, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1223 834244 ex 6925
Fax: +44 (0)1223 496802


-- 
 The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.