[Lustre-discuss] most recent kernel version for patchless client?

Wed Dec 14 10:22:53 PST 2011

Hi Michael.

There is no 3.x support neither for client(doesn't matter patchless or
not) nor for the server.
The activity for support adding is tracked in WC ticket
http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-812 - guess you may sign on it and
receive updates (for Lustre 2.x).
I have no information if there are any plans to add 3.x support to the
1.8.x.  
Btw: the latest kernel version I used for 1.8.7 is 2.6.32.45.

Regards,
    Iurii

On 14.12.11 19:29, "lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org"
<lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org> wrote:

>Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:15:14 +0100
>From: Michael Kluge <Michael.Kluge at tu-dresden.de>
>Subject: [Lustre-discuss] most recent kernel version for patchless
>    client?
>To: Lustre Diskussionsliste <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>
>Message-ID: <0FC505DB-9DD1-47B3-949A-101FEC4C0496 at tu-dresden.de>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi list,
>
>I am looking for information what the most recent kernel version is that
>I can use to build a patchless client for. OFED for example refuses to
>build on kernels >3.0.0. Has someone recently tried newer kernels with
>1.8.7 ?
>
>
>Regards, Michael
>
>-- 
>
>Dr.-Ing. Michael Kluge
>
>Technische Universit?t Dresden
>Center for Information Services and
>High Performance Computing (ZIH)
>D-01062 Dresden
>Germany
>
>Contact:
>Willersbau, Room WIL A 208
>Phone:  (+49) 351 463-34217
>Fax:    (+49) 351 463-37773
>e-mail: michael.kluge at tu-dresden.de
>WWW:    http://www.tu-dresden.de/zih
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20111214/e17b
>b947/attachment-0001.html
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: smime.p7s
>Type: application/pkcs7-signature
>Size: 2266 bytes
>Desc: not available
>Url : 
>http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20111214/e17b
>b947/attachment-0001.bin
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:28:41 -0800
>From: Shay Seager <ssseager at gmail.com>
>Subject: [Lustre-discuss] LUG 2012
>To: "Shay Seager (shay at opensfs.org)" <shay at opensfs.org>
>Message-ID: <6127DC81-8924-4419-B664-F03AA6FECA59 at gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>
>> 
>> JOIN US IN AUSTIN!  LUG 2012 will be held at the Hyatt Regency Austin,
>>Downtown on the Lake, Monday, April 23rd 2012 through Wednesday, April
>>25th 2012.
>> 
>> This 2 1/2 day event is the primary venue for discussion and seminars
>>on open source parallel file system technologies with a unique focus on
>>the Lustre? parallel file system.
>> 
>> LUG is a user-led event whose organizing committee is made up of
>>representatives from Indiana University (IU), Naval Research Laboratory
>>(NRL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Sandia National
>>Laboratories (SNL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL),
>>European Open File Systems (EOFS), and Texas Advanced Computing Center
>>(TACC).
>> 
>> 
>> For more information and registration:  http://www.opensfs.org/lug
>>               To register for the event
>>http://lug-opensfs.eventbrite.com/
>>               To reserve your room at  the Hyatt Regency Austin
>>https://resweb.passkey.com/Resweb.do?mode=welcome_gi_new&groupID=6750202
>>           
>> 
>> Want to get involved?
>> The LUG program committee would like to invite members of the Lustre
>>community to submit
>> 
>> presentation abstracts for inclusion in this year?s meeting. It is not
>>necessary to submit a
>> 
>> technical paper, just an abstract of your proposed talk no more than a
>>page in length. Talks
>> 
>> should target a half an hour in length and reflect the work that you or
>>your site are doing with
>> 
>> Lustre?.
>> 
>> The deadline to submit presentation abstracts is February 14, 2012. For
>>questions
>> 
>> or to submit a presentation abstract, contact the program committee
>>chair, Stephen Simms:
>> 
>> submissions at opensfs.org
>> 
>> 
>> Contact Shay - shay at opensfs.org with any questions
>> 
>> We look forward to seeing you in Austin!
>> OpenSFS
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> - - - 
>> Shay Seager
>> Open SFS Secretary
>> www.opensfs.org
>> (925) 290-7641
>> shay at opensfs.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20111213/897d
>e66d/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:32:34 +0100
>From: Riccardo Trebbi <riccardo.trebbi89 at gmail.com>
>Subject: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre locking
>To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>Message-ID:
>    <CABzZ0PGZvW0UZPwX8he1diJJGED3DHyOis1rwv_-1Fyr02svbw at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi everybody,
>
>I have successfully installed lustre filesystem (version 2.0) on a
>virtuabox environment in order to make some test for a university project
>that I am following.
>
>I have found all kinds of information on lustre but it seems that I cannot
>find something about lustre locking mechanism.
>
>Also, are there some locking parameters that can be tuned or modified?
>
>Finally, could you recommend me some tools in order to make some tests on
>locking rate on lustre?
>
>I have no goals in particular except having lustre functioning clear and
>run some useful tests.
>
>Thank you all in advance,
>
>Riccardo
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20111214/57db
>4166/attachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Lustre-discuss mailing list
>Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
>End of Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 71, Issue 15
>**********************************************