[Lustre-discuss] status of lustre 2.0 on 2.6.18-194.17.1.0.1.el5 kernels

[Samuel Aparicio]

thanks for this note.
is lustre 2.0 regarded as stable for production?

Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath
Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency
675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada.
office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website http://molonc.bccrc.ca





On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Colin Faber wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've built several against 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 kernels without problem 
> so I would think you can probably get away with 0.1 as well.
> 
> -cf
> 
> 
> On 01/07/2011 06:05 PM, Samuel Aparicio wrote:
>> Is it known if Lustre 2.0 GA will run with 2.6.18-194.17.1.0.1.el5 
>> kernels. The test matrix has only the 164 kernel as the latest tested.
>> 
>> Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath
>> Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency
>> 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada.
>> office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website 
>> http://molonc.bccrc.ca <http://molonc.bccrc.ca/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20110111/4be7aa68/attachment.htm>