[Lustre-discuss] IB storage as an OST target
Andrus, Brian Contractor
bdandrus at nps.edu
Thu Mar 31 02:17:53 PDT 2011
Brian
We do that here at NPS without much trouble - anymore ;)
One thing to watch: if you are using opensm for your subnet manager and
the latest kernels for lustre (1.8.4/5 or 2.0) you need a newer opensm
than is on the CentOS 5.5 disks. Get the one from the updates. It seems
there was a change in the ibsrp kernel module that made it incompatible
with opensm on the same disk.
Brian Andrus
ITACS/Research Computing
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
voice: 831-656-6238
-----Original Message-----
From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org
[mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Brian
O'Connor
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 10:21 PM
To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-discuss] IB storage as an OST target
Anybody had any experience using an IB based storage
target as an OST?
Apart from the obvious issue of separating the IB SAN(SRP/SER)
storage traffic from the Lustre traffic are there any issues?
What about failover?
--
Brian O'Connor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SGI Consulting
Email: briano at sgi.com, Mobile +61 417 746 452
Phone: +61 3 9963 1900, Fax: +61 3 9963 1902
357 Camberwell Road, Camberwell, Victoria, 3124
AUSTRALIA
http://www.sgi.com/support/services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list