[Lustre-discuss] Optimal stratgy for OST distribution
Heckes, Frank
f.heckes at fz-juelich.de
Thu Mar 31 07:06:39 PDT 2011
Hi all,
sorry if this question has been answered before.
What is the optimal 'strategy' assigning OSTs to OSS nodes:
-a- Assign OST via round-robin to the OSS
-b- Assign in consecutive order (as long as the backend storage provides
enought capacity for iops and bandwidth)
-c- Something 'in-between' the 'extremes' of -a- and -b-
E.g.:
-a- OSS_1 OSS_2 OST_3
|_ |_ |_
OST_1 OST_2 OST_3
OST_4 OST_5 OST_6
OST_7 OST_8 OST_9
-b- OSS_1 OSS_2 OST_3
|_ |_ |_
OST_1 OST_4 OST_7
OST_2 OST_5 OST_8
OST_3 OST_6 OST_9
I thought -a- would be best for task-local (each task write to own
file) and single file (all task write to single file) I/O since its like
a raid-0 approach used disk I/O (and SUN create our first FS this way).
Does someone made any systematic investigations which approach is best
or have some educated opinion?
Many thanks in advance.
BR
-Frank Heckes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
52425 Juelich
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender),
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt,
Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besuchen Sie uns auf unserem neuen Webauftritt unter www.fz-juelich.de
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list