[Lustre-discuss] Redundant mkfs.lustre options?

Charland, Denis Denis.Charland at imi.cnrc-nrc.gc.ca
Mon Nov 7 08:50:39 PST 2011


It looks like the two following mkfs.lustre options are the same:

--mountfsoptions="stripe="  and  --mkfsoptions "-E stripe-width="

>From documentation:

--mountfsoptions="stripe=<stripe_width_blocks>"

where <stripe_width_blocks> = <stripe_width> / 4K

we known that <stripe_width> = <chunksize> * <number of data disks>

so <stripe_width_blocks> = <chunksize> * <number of data disks> / 4k

we also know that <stride-size> = <chunksize> / 4K

that gives <chunksize> = <stride-size> * 4K

so <stripe_width_blocks> = <stride-size> * 4K *<number of data disks> / 4K = <stride-size> * <number of data disks>

Finally we have

mkfs.lustre . . . --mountfsoptions="stripe=<stride-size>*<number of data disks>"

And from mkfs.lustre and mke2fs man pages, we have:

mkfs.lustre . . . -mkfsoptions "-E stripe-width=<stride-size>*<number of data disks>"

Are these two options redundant and only one of them should be specified?

Denis Charland
UNIX Systems Administrator
National Research Council Canada
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20111107/9bc15fcd/attachment.htm>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list