[Lustre-discuss] [wc-discuss] Re: Lustre 2.2 production experience

[Larry]

We have deployed 2.1.1 for several clusters, which each has hundreds of
nodes.
On Jun 10, 2012 6:05 AM, "Wojciech Turek" <wjt27 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre
> release process and thought that the next stable/production version is
> 2.2
>
> I am then interested in the experience of people running Lustre 2.1
>
> Cheers
>
> Wojciech
>
> On 9 June 2012 21:52, Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com> wrote:
> > I think you'll find that there are not yet (m)any production deployments
> of 2.2. There are a number of production 2.1 deployments, and this is the
> current maintenance stream from Whamcloud.
> >
> > Cheers, Andreas
> >
> > On 2012-06-09, at 14:33, Wojciech Turek <wjt27 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> I am building a 1.5PB storage system which will employ Lustre as the
> >> main file system. The storage system will be extended at the later
> >> stage beyond 2PB.  I am considering using Lustre 2.2 for production
> >> environment. This Lustre storage system will replace our older 300TB
> >> system which is currently running Lustre 1.8.8. I am quite happy with
> >> lustre 1.8.8 however for the new system Lustre 2.2 seem to be a better
> >> match.  The storage system will be attached to a university wide
> >> cluster (800 nodes), hence there will be quite a large range of
> >> applications using the filesystem. Could people with production
> >> deployments of Lustre 2.2 share their experience please?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wojciech Turek
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20120610/9b1586a3/attachment.htm>