[lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?
Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
rmohr at utk.edu
Tue Aug 16 07:37:51 PDT 2016
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:55 AM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu> wrote:
> I just found this paper:
> It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how relevant it still is…..
Some of the information should still be relevant. In my opinion, it is still worthwhile reading to get a better idea on what is happening inside of Lustre (even if some of the details are out of date).
Senior HPC System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
More information about the lustre-discuss