[lustre-discuss] lnet router lustre rpm compatibility

Dilger, Andreas andreas.dilger at intel.com
Wed Jun 22 17:01:10 PDT 2016

The only requirement for upgrade ordering in the past was during the 1.8->2.x upgrade.  In that case, 1.8 clients could connect to both 1.8 and 2.x servers, while 2.x clients can only connect to 2.x servers.  Since then there isn't a hard requirement for upgrade ordering, though we only test a few combinations of versions together.

Cheers, Andreas
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division

On 2016/06/22, 13:28, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Alexander I Kulyavtsev" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of aik at fnal.gov<mailto:aik at fnal.gov>> wrote:

Servers upgraded first or with clients. Alex.

On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:01 AM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>> wrote:

I always understood the recommendation was to update the clients (and LNET Routers) before the servers and not the other way around?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20160623/83d0deae/attachment.htm>

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list