[lustre-discuss] lnet router lustre rpm compatibility
andreas.dilger at intel.com
Wed Jun 22 17:01:10 PDT 2016
The only requirement for upgrade ordering in the past was during the 1.8->2.x upgrade. In that case, 1.8 clients could connect to both 1.8 and 2.x servers, while 2.x clients can only connect to 2.x servers. Since then there isn't a hard requirement for upgrade ordering, though we only test a few combinations of versions together.
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division
On 2016/06/22, 13:28, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Alexander I Kulyavtsev" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of aik at fnal.gov<mailto:aik at fnal.gov>> wrote:
Servers upgraded first or with clients. Alex.
On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:01 AM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr+lustre at mail.hebrew.edu>> wrote:
I always understood the recommendation was to update the clients (and LNET Routers) before the servers and not the other way around?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lustre-discuss