[lustre-discuss] Large file read performance degradation from multiple OST's

Xiong, Jinshan jinshan.xiong at intel.com
Wed May 31 10:07:29 PDT 2017

It’s LU-9574.


On May 30, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Jones, Peter A <peter.a.jones at intel.com<mailto:peter.a.jones at intel.com>> wrote:


Can you please open a JIRA ticket with this information?



On 5/30/17, 12:10 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Vicker, Darby (JSC-EG311)" <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on behalf of darby.vicker-1 at nasa.gov<mailto:darby.vicker-1 at nasa.gov>> wrote:

Using the git bisect we were able to isolate the problem to this commit:

commit d8467ab8a2ca15fbbd5be3429c9cf9ceb0fa78b8
    LU-7990 clio: revise readahead to support 16MB IO

In our testing, we can read from a large file (stripe count=4) at near line rate (10 GbE – so 1200 MB/s) using a client compiled with the commit before this one.  With this patch, the read rate drops to ~200 MB/s.
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20170531/d4ffca87/attachment.htm>

More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list