[lustre-discuss] MOFED 4.4-1.0.0.0

[E.S. Rosenberg]

Does mofed make a big difference vs. in-kernel ofed that is worth the
effort?

Regards,
Eli

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev <aik at fnal.gov> wrote:

> Hi Megan,
>
> Standard lustre build works with in-kernel ofed. To use Mellanox ofed you
> have to rebuild lustre:
>
> http://wiki.lustre.org/Compiling_Lustre
>
> Apparently there is version of lustre 2.10.4 built with mlx ofed in
> whamcloud download area:
>
>                 https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.10.
> 4-ib/
>
>
>
> What version did you try?
>
>
>
> Best regards, Alex.
>
>
>
> *From: *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> on
> behalf of "Ms. Megan Larko" <dobsonunit at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:26 AM
> *To: *Lustre User Discussion Mailing List <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> >
> *Subject: *[lustre-discuss] MOFED 4.4-1.0.0.0
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have found that Lustre-2.10.4 works only with CentOS linux kernel
> 3.10.0-693.x. and newer.  I discovered that Mellanox MOFED 4.3(or
> 4?)-1.0.1.0 (I'm not where I can verify the MOFED version number but it is
> 4 and ending in "1.0.1.0")  will not work with CentOS linux kernel
> 3.10.0-8*.  So I have a successful Lustre 2.10.4 with the "693" linux
> kernel series and MOFED 4.3/4-1.0.1.0
>
>
>
> So I will second the statement that the software version stack is indeed
> "particular".
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> megan
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20180814/ae994f88/attachment.html>